About TAG
The Partners
Events
Investigative Reports
Surveys
Citizen Action
Case Studies
Corporate Governance
Philippine Laws
Executive Watch
CongressWatch©
Judiciary Watch
Local Government Watch
Graft Busters
References
Search
Home
 



The Fertilizer Scam

15 March 2006—The Senate Committees on Agriculture and Food, and Accountability of Public Officers and Investigations (Blue Ribbon) recently completed a series of public hearings on a fertilizer fund scam and concluded that agricultural funds intended for farmers were diverted by Agriculture Undersecretary Jocelyn “Joc-joc” Bolante for the 2004 electoral campaign of President Gloria Arroyo.

Former solicitor general Francisco Chavez earlier filed plunder cases in May and June 2004 against President Arroyo, Agriculture Secretary Luis Lorenzo, Budget Secretary Emila Boncodin, Budget Undersecretary Mario Relampagos, and Agriculture Undersecretary Jocelyn Bolante, among others, for alleged misuse of agricultural funds.

Soon after, ABS-CBN’s Probe Team reported in August 2005 that a number of congressmen who were supposed to receive allocations for the farm inputs denied getting such funds. The Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism also conducted its own investigation and discovered that a portion of a P728-million fertilizer fund was released to bogus foundations.

Testimonies and corroborative statements of DA officials, 13 farmer groups, Commission on Audit officials, Budget Secretary Emilia Boncodin, and alleged “runners” of Bolante concluded that farmers did not get a single “farm input or implement” in 2004. At least two LGU officials testified that their districts did not receive any fertilizer in spite of records showing that deliveries had been made. Several congressmen also denied having made requests for fertilizer assistance or receiving fertilizers.

Asked if Usec. Bolante’s request for funds was upon the instructions of the President, former Budget Secretary Emilia Boncodin replied, “I would imagine so.”

Who is Joc-joc Bolante?
The committee report points to Bolante as the principal architect and implementor of the scam. He negotiated the release of funds from the Department of Budget and Management, authorized fund release and picked the fertilizer fund’s proponents. He also wrote congressmen and local officials informing them of the availability of funds.

He was the first appointee of the President in the DA (even prior to Sec. Leonardo Montemayor’s appointment) and concurrently held positions as acting chairman of the National Irrigation Administration, Livelihood Corp., and Strategic Investments and Development Corp. He was also a director of the National Power Corp. and Land Bank of the Philippines.

Wrong timing for fertilizers
The fertilizer fund appropriation was implemented only in 2004, incidentally during the election season. Funds were released from February to May 2004 or during harvest months when fertilizers are of no use because planting time starts in November. The DA’s Rice Program (known as GMA or Ginintuang Masaganang Ani) director Frisco Malabanan testified that fertilizer requirements for 2003 totaled only P28.613 million for the entire Philippines — compared to the P2.806 billion released in 2004.

Overpriced and inappropriate fertilizer
The fertilizers used were actually liquid fertilizers known as foliar, normally used for ornamental plants and flowers and anything leafy but not usually used for rice or corn. To add insult to injury, the “wrong and overpriced fertilizer for rice was even diluted with water.” The Commission on Audit reported overpricing of foliar fertilizer (allegedly supplied in all transactions) from 700 to 1,250 percent. For instance, a witness cited Bio Nature liquid fertilizer regularly sold in the market at P180 to P350 per bottle was priced at P1,500 per bottle.

Sharing scheme
Atty. Frank Chavez testified that the fertilizer funds were shared in the following manner: 25% for the DA official (referring to Jocelyn Bolante); 30% for concerned mayors, governors and congressmen; 20% for the supplier of farm inputs; and 25% for DA official runners. A certain Jose Barredo, Jr. also testified under oath (as being one of the runners) how the fertilizer scam operated and how he offered the fertilizers to local officials and congressmen.

Who were the fertilizer suppliers?
In spite of the size of the program, no major fertilizer supplier appeared to have participated in the program. The Fertilizer Industry Association of the Philippines (FIAP), which has 17 member-companies and a market share of 95%, testified that it did not participate in the DA’s fertilizer program.

Instead, AKAME Marketing, Castle Rock Construction, and FESHAN Philippines, Inc. were identified as the suppliers of the fertilizer. Two of the companies could not be traced and one has no prior track record of dealing in fertilizers. Feshan, for instance, is originally a medical supplier and started to supply fertilizers only in 2004.

Bigger pie
The Senate Committees on Agriculture and Blue Ribbon revealed that the P728 million fund is just a portion of the Larger Fertilizer Fund released during the 2004 elections. The Department of Agriculture received P2.806 billion for the purchase of farm inputs and implements before the 10 May 2004 elections.

Nature of Fund/Program
SARO Number and Date
Amount
GMA Farm Inputs and Implements E-04-00164
(Feb. 3, 2004)
P0.728 billion
GMA Rice and Corn E-04-00294
(Feb. 11, 2004)
P1.102 billion
Marcos Wealth for CARP E-04-01090
(Apr. 28, 2004)
P0.544 billion

GMA Rice Program and Fertilizer Procurement and Distribution Component

From Agency Budget Matrix (regular budget) P0.432 billion
    P2.806 billion

Criminal culpability
The Senate committees recommended the overhaul of the Department of Agriculture. Filing of criminal and administrative charges were recommended against Agriculture Undersecretary Jocelyn Bolante, Secretary Luis Lorenzo, Undersecretary Ibarra Poliquit, Undersecretary Belinda Gonzales, Assistant Secretary Jose Felix Montes, and all DA regional directors who participated in the fertilizer scam. President Arroyo (who may have had knowledge of the Bolante requests for funds) was also asked to account for the mismanagement of the fertilizer fund. Private sector partners or suppliers who connived with the DA in overpricing diluted fertilizers and ghost deliveries could also be charged.

Holding the (empty) bag
Farmer groups that testified in the Senate Fertilizer Scam hearings and claimed that they had not received fertilizer assistance:

  • Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas (KMP)
  • Pambansang Ugnayan ng mga Nagsasariling Organisasyon sa Kanayunan (UNORKA)
  • Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas
  • Kalipunan ng mga Maliliit na Magniniyog sa Pilipinas
  • Katipunan ng Samahang Magbubukid sa Timog Katagalugan (KASAMA-TK)
  • Pahagpong sa mga Mag-uuma sa Panay (PAMANGGAS)
  • Katipunan ng Samahang Magsisibuyas (KASAMNE)
  • Alyansa ng Magbubukid sa Gitnang Luzon
  • KMP-Southern Tagalog
  • Samahan ng Gugti ng mga Parag-uma – Sinirangan Bisaya (SAGUPA-SB)
  • SAGUPA-SB, Northern Samar
  • National Federation of Peasant Women (AMIHAN)
  • KMP-Bicol

Source: Senate Resolution No. 327, Committee Report No. 54 (filed on 1 March 2006)

DA officials involved in fertilizer scam face plunder

Net Worth Statements of Legislators

No Work, No Pay

How Representative is Congress?

Legislators' Profiles

Performance Review

Congress spent P1.4 billion in 2002

Net Worth Statements
as of Dec 2003
as of Dec 2002
as of Dec 2001

COA Expenditure Report

The Perks of Pork

Is Pork Good for the People?

The Anti-money Laundering Act of 2001

How Ombudsman Desierto Bid The Tax Credit Scam Goodbye

Tangcangco Impeachment Complaint

Would Congress Still Pursue Desierto's Impeachment?

How much did the Senators Spend to Win?
Elections 2001

 
Tag.org.ph is supported by The Asia Foundation and the U.S. Agency for International Development under the terms of Award No. 492-G-00-98-00020-00. The opinions expressed here are those of
the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views
of The Asia Foundation or the U.S. Agency for International Development.

This site is managed by the Makati Business Club.


         about TAGthe partnerseventsinvestigative reportssurveyscitizen actioncase studiescorporate governancephilippine laws
              executive watchCongressWatch©judiciary watchlocal government watchgraftbustersreferencessearche-mail us home